| The instructor presented course concepts clearly. |
- |
- |
11% |
33% |
56% |
|
| The instructor was knowledgeable about Agile principles and practices. |
- |
- |
- |
22% |
78% |
|
| The course topics are well chosen and addressed my needs. |
- |
11% |
11% |
45% |
33% |
|
| The instructor was organized in managing the classroom setting. |
- |
11% |
- |
33% |
56% |
|
| The instructor helped me learn. |
- |
- |
11% |
22% |
67% |
|
| The instructor managed questions from participants appropriately. |
- |
- |
11% |
11% |
78% |
|
| The instructor's teaching methods (lecture, small groups, pairs, etc) were suitable for the workshop. |
- |
11% |
- |
44% |
45% |
|
| I am confident that I can apply this training in my role within my company. |
- |
- |
12% |
38% |
50% |
|
| The course materials are clear and concise. |
- |
- |
11% |
44% |
45% |
|
|
Comments:
|
- Timely and valuable since my organization is currently trying to figure out how to manage projects in an agile way using scrum
- This class was a great experience. Jim understood the audience well. He assumed a certain degree of understanding of basic concepts (which was good) and moved to practical PM tools. I particularly liked the Vision Box exercise. I'm looking to incorporate several things presented into my PM work.
- Jim obviously has a very high level of knowledge and experience in the Agile world; however, his presentation/platform style was not very conducive for my learning. The instructional messaging and design of the course were not effective - if even followed. I would still attend another of Jim's presentations with the associated materials though.
|
